In defense of Paul Johnson

I am responding to a letter published in the April 6 edition of your paper that was critical of board of education member Paul Johnson. While recognizing the right of a person to criticize, I feel that facts and truth must be respected. The issues raised were not as described. I served with Johnson as a board member during the period and/or through the events mentioned. My experience with Paul Johnson covers more than seven years of regular meetings, special meetings and committee meetings. It is true that in the past, one half of the board did sue the other. With Armen Koochagian as board president, an improper action was taken to fill a vacant board seat. When attempts by half of the board (including Johnson) to correct this fault were denied, a suit was entered in court in Morristown. The judge found in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered the action rescinded. The judge ruled the board had acted improperly. As to Johnson lacking a “sense of urgency,” this is also untrue. During the period when the board was looking for land, Johnson and a few other board members, myself included, were urging and requesting the board to meet more frequently than once a month. We knew that time was critical to reach a solution. Unfortunately, other members did not feel this way and time passed without action. I believe this contributed to the district missing out on opportunities and the state construction funds. I have known Paul Johnson to be a committed, hard working and knowledgeable board member, who wants the best for our students. Negative letters like the one written by Daryl Savage are not an accurate portrayal of his dedication and contribution to the schools. Paul was always well prepared for the meetings and did his research on topics before making any decisions. It is unfortunate that the public does not see what really happens behind the scene. The board needs more members who are willing to ask the tough questions and challenge recommendations prior to taking action. Rick Finkle Sparta